Yet, the spate of misinterpretations and misjudgements these experts have made, especially during times of crisis, raises questions about their understanding of Iran’s intricate dynamics. Central to this narrative is the role and influence of the People’s Mojahedin of Iran (PMOI/MEK), a formidable movement in Iran’s political sphere. Notwithstanding its significant impact in challenging successive autocratic regimes, the MEK’s legacy has been systematically undermined. Many Western analysts have pointed to the organization’s alleged association with Saddam Hussein during the Iran-Iraq war, using it as a foundation to question the MEK’s credibility and influence within Iran.

 

As the Iranian regime marks “Sacred Defense Week”—a commemoration not of war’s end but its beginning—it’s a poignant moment to reevaluate these historical missteps. September 22 is etched in Iranian consciousness for the onset of the Iran-Iraq War, a conflict that exacted a grim toll on Iran, from its million-plus casualties to its staggering economic and infrastructural devastation.

History indicates that the Supreme Leader Ruhollah Khomeini was hardly a pacifist. From border skirmishes to his provocation for the overthrow of the Baath party in Iraq, Khomeini showcased his aggressive intent. However, when Iraqi forces invaded on September 22, 1980, Khomeini swiftly rebranded it as a godsend, rallying the nation behind a defensive call to arms.

 

 

The MEK, true to their commitment to the nation, took up arms against the invaders. Yet, their greatest challenge was not from the outside but from within. The newly formed Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps viewed the MEK with suspicion and hostility, often attacking them from the rear, branding them as spies, or arresting them. After enduring such betrayals, the MEK was left with no option but to recede from active war duties.

The Khomeini regime’s obstinacy prolonged the war, even after Iraqi forces retreated in May 1982. The clerical leadership’s aspirations were vividly summed up in their motto, “Conquering Jerusalem via Karbala.”

 

 

In stark opposition, the MEK and the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) pursued peace. Their international campaign, amassing 5,000 signatures from global leaders, underscored the overwhelming demand for peace.

By 1986, circumstances led the MEK to Iraq, but not without ensuring their autonomy. There, the National Liberation Army (NLA) of Iran was formed, which carried out numerous successful operations against the Iranian regime.

It was only when the NLA threatened the regime’s very heart in Tehran did Khomeini, previously dismissive of peace overtures, suddenly capitulate and agree to a ceasefire in 1988.

 

 

Regrettably, the regime’s mastery over narrative-building and misinformation continues unabated, often facilitated by the so-called “Iran experts.” The MEK’s true legacy deserves rigorous examination, devoid of bias or misinterpretation.

 

 

---

MEK Iran (follow us on Twitter and Facebook), Maryam Rajavi’s on her site, Twitter & Facebook, NCRI  (Twitter & Facebook), and People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran – MEK IRAN – YouTu