Posts Tagged ‘freedom of expression’

freedom of expression,Human Rights,NCRI,Telegram ban in Iran

Telegram banned in Iran

The Iranian Regime Blocks Telegram in an Indication of its Weakening Grip on Power

Telegram banned in Iran

Telegram was officially banned in Iran

Although it had been talked about for months, Iran’s judiciary finally made the announcement on Monday, April 30th, that it would block Telegram. In a statement, the judiciary said, the “blocking should be implemented in a way that the content of this network will not be available in the country with any software”.

The decision to block the social network stemmed from the regime’s fear that the messaging service provided a platform for protestors to mobilise and organise their demonstrations against the regime. The judiciary statement alluded to the dissemination of “propaganda against the system through this messenger.”

Human Rights Groups Have Condemned the Decision

With more than 40 million users, Telegram was the main social media platform for Iranians. Human Rights Watch called the decision to block the service “an unjustifiable restriction on freedom of information”.

An Indicator of Success

The decision to block Telegram is a direct reflection of the success of the protestors and the threat they represent to the regime’s authority. Despite the fact that Rouhani had publicly stated he opposes bans to the country’s social media, but due to the widespread protests flaring up across the country, the regime had little choice but to proceed with repressive measures to retain its grip on power.

Last year the regime arrested more than 70,000 cyberspace users for allegedly “threatening “the tranquillity of the country”. This, like the ban, is a reflection of the regime’s inability to quash public dissent. It has to resort to extreme repression to stay in power.

The Ban Will Not Disrupt the Determination of the Iranian People

Last time the regime banned Telegram, for two weeks in December 2017, when the nation was in the grip of national protests, there were reports that some 30 million people used bypass tools. The ban did not bring an end to the protests; it only fuelled the drive of the Iranian people to intensify their resistance.

The same is expected to occur on this occasion.

In a statement, the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI),  strongly condemned the “mass arrests and unprecedented repression of Internet users” and calls on all international human rights organizations, including Special Rapporteur on the Freedom of Speech, and the Working Group on Arbitrary Arrests, the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and other relevant international bodies to strongly condemn the mullahs regime for this brutal suppression.

The international community should stand by the Iranian people and condemn the clear violation of the Iranian public’s civil liberties. The UN Security Council and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) should add their voices to those of the human rights organizations and take measures to overturn this breach of international law.

Staff writer

Please follow and like us:

Continue Reading

Amnesty International,execution,fair trial,freedom of expression,Human Rights,MEK,PMOI

Iran placed on “forces of instability” list for its widespread human rights abuses

Iran placed on “forces of instability” list for its widespread human rights abuses

Iran placed on “forces of instability” list for its widespread human rights abuses

Iran placed on “forces of instability” list for its widespread human rights abuses

The United States Government has included the Iranian regime in a list of the countries labeled as “forces of instability” for their routine human rights abuse, emphasizing that the abuses that take place in these countries are “morally reprehensible”.

The list comes after the Iranian regime denied access to the UN Special Rapporteur investigating the situation of human rights abuses in Iran. There has also been a steady stream of reports of human rights abuses coming out of Iran, including the imprisonment of human rights defenders.

There is limited freedom of expression

The Iranian authorities frequently imprison journalists, protestors, peaceful critics, filmmakers, students, activists, and lawyers for criticising the regime. Most concerningly, many of those seeking truth and justice for the mass executions carried out by the regime in the 1980s now find themselves behind bars.

This was particularly apparent in the run-up to the presidential election last May. Journalists and bloggers were persecuted and arrested, some of whom received prison sentences of more than a decade and some had their assets frozen, and the country’s Association of Journalists has been indefinitely suspended.

Social media outlets like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube remain blocked in Iran. The authorities have also attempted to restrict musical expression. Women cannot legally sing in public, and President Rouhani has canceled concerts across the country.

Torture is routinely used as an interrogation tool

Solitary confinement and torture are routinely used in interrogations conducted by the Ministry for Intelligence and the Revolutionary Guards. Prisoners have received limited access to medical care and are kept in conditions which amount to torture, including limited access to food and hot water, limited ventilation and insect infestations.

Torture is not limited to interrogations. It has also been used as a method of public punishment in Iran. For even relatively minor incidents, lashings can be handed out. Men, women, and children receive public lashings as punishment for crimes such as extra-marital relationships, attending parties with those of the opposite gender, and eating in public during Ramadan. A journalist in Najaf Abad received 40 lashings in January for inaccurately reporting the number of motorcycles the police had confiscated across the city.

More severe crimes are awarded horrific acts of torture as punishment. In Kohgiluyeh, a woman was blinded as punishment for blinding another woman and amputations are frequently carried out as a punishment for robbery.

A variety of non-lethal drug offenses carry a mandatory death penalty, with executions often conducted in public. There are also vaguely worded charges which allow the regime to distribute the death penalty to its political opponents. Mohamed Ali Taheri, for example, was sentenced to death for “spreading corruption on earth”.

Those accused do not receive a fair trial

Iran’s judicial system has no independent mechanism to guarantee judicial impartiality and accountability. Judges are frequently appointed to their positions for their political allegiances, not for their qualifications or professional competency.

Those arrested for political reasons are frequently denied access to an independent lawyer, instead of being forced to choose from a list provided by the Head of the Judiciary. There have also been reports of trails lasting just a matter of minutes before sentences were handed down, surmounting to little more than a show trial.

Non-Shi’a Muslims face civil exclusion

Non-Shi’a Muslims are not permitted to run for political office in Iran. The Baha’i minority face arbitrary persecution, including arrests, the forcible closure of their businesses, the confiscation of Baha’i properties, and restricted access to higher education. The regime has also taken a lenient stance towards those who commit crimes against the Baha’i minority. Two men were released on bail in June despite admitting killing a man of the Baha’i faith.

Christian places of worship are routinely raided, and if any churchgoers are found to have converted to the Christian faith, they can receive up to 15 years imprisonment. Any citizen that publicly advocates atheism is also subject to arrest and torture.

Ethnic minorities live in conditions of economic neglect

Ethnic minorities are subjected to routine discrimination in employment and access to education and housing. Ahwazi Arabs, Kurds, Turkmen, and Baluchis often live in areas which have limited access to electricity and water. Limited access to education means illiteracy rates, particularly among girls, are high. Deprivation of basic sanitation and healthcare means infant mortality rates are high in these areas.

Women in Iran are subject to widespread discrimination, with restricted employment prospects and unequal inheritance opportunities. Those caught wearing tight clothing or heavily made up in public face harassment and detention from the authorities. The wearing of the hijab in public is compulsory, and those who have attempted to campaign against it, have become subject to state-sponsored smear campaigns and regular harassment.

The manner in which the Iranian regularly abuses the rights of its civilian population should be a cause for concern for any international government that views itself as a human rights advocate. The international community must adopt a firmer approach towards the Iranian regime for the way it keeps its people in a perpetual state of suffering.

Simon Wiesenthal famously said that “for evil to flourish, it only requires good men to do nothing”. The Iranian population is fighting on in their resistance to the Iranian regime’s human rights abuses. Recent protestors risked their liberty and lives to protest the regime. Now the international community must follow suit. They can do nothing, or the evil of Khamenei’s regime will flourish.

 

Please follow and like us:

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2018 MEK-Iran.com. All Rights Reserved
Assign a menu in the Left Menu options.
Social media & sharing icons powered by UltimatelySocial